Substantive features of the system of the sustainable recreational nature use on rural territories in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37659/2663-5070-2018-1-16-25Keywords:
rural territory, recreational use of the nature, sustainable development, recreational resource, recreation and tourism sector, green rural tourism.Abstract
In the article key characteristics of the system of the sustainable recreational natural resource management in rural areas of Ukraine are substantiated. The aim is to increase the efficiency of the natural recreational resources use taking into account social and ecological functions of the recreation enterprises. Recreational nature management is defined as an economic activity aimed at the rational use of natural recreational resources providing health and recreational services. It carries out a number of economic, social and environmental functions, which play an important role in improving the quality of life of people and contribute to the sustainable development’ goals. It is substantiated that recreational nature management is closely connected with recreational and tourist areas, which became integral parts of the economy of many countries of the world. Demand for recreation and tourism services is constantly increasing due to globalization, socio-economic and technological factors, which actualizes the need to develop comprehensive measures aimed at preserving and restoring recreational resources, their rational and efficient use. In this context, the main strategic goals of tourism and recreation development in rural areas and components of the sustainable recreational nature management system are determined. The expediency of providing an effective interaction of the developed system levels (like organizational, financial, economic, legal, information and communication, etc.) is underlined. Indicators of the sustainable recreational nature management system’s efficiency are determined and the relevance of further scientific researches on the development of mechanisms to meet interests of various stakeholders is proved.
References
Andrieieva, N., Nezdoiminov, S., & Dyshlovyi, I. (2011). Suchasna orhanizatsiia ahrarnoho turyzmu v Ukraini yak perspektyvnyi napriamok rozvytku silskykh terytorii [Modern organization of the agrarian tourism in Ukraine as the perspective trend of the development of rural areas]. Ekonomist – The Economist, 7 (297), 25-28 [in Ukrainian].
2.Bezuhlyi, I.V. (2014). Imperatyvy rozrobky stratehii ekoloho-ekonomichnoho rozvytku rekreatsiino-turystychnykh system [Imperatives of the development of the strategy of ecological and economic establishment of recreational and tourist systems]. Visnyk Berdianskoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu – The herald of Berdiansk Institute of Management and Business, 3 (27), 84–90 [in Ukrainian].
Khvesyk M.A, & Lyzun S.O. (Eds.). (2015). Ekonomichni aspekty upravlinnia pryrodnymy resursamy ta zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku v umovakh detsentralizatsii vlady v Ukraini [Economic aspects of natural resources management and ensuring the sustainable development under decentralization of power in Ukraine]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku NAN Ukrainy” [in Ukrainian].
Borodina, O.M., Zaiats, T.A., & Kutsenko, V.I. (2014). Kontseptualni zasady sotsialno-ekolohichnoho rozvytku silskykh terytorii [Conceptual principles of social and ecological development of rural territories]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannya ta staloho rozvytku NAN Ukrainy” [in Ukrainian].
Kostrytsia, M.M., Khadakivskyi, Y.I., & Tsal-Tsalko, Yu.S. (2006). Silskyi turyzm: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka (etnoistorychnyi turystychnyi klaster “Drevlianska zemlia”) [Agricultural tourism: theory, methodology, practice (ethno–historical tourist cluster “Drevlyunsky land”)]. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrskyi derzh. tekhnolohichnyi un-t [in Ukrainian].
Lypchuk, V., & Lypchuk, N. (2008). Ahroturyzm: orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni zasady rozvytku [Agritourism: Organizational and Economic Principles of the Development]. Lviv: SPOLOM [in Ukrainian].
Lytvyn, I.V., & Nek, M.O. (2013). Problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku silskoho zelenoho turyzmu v rehioni [Problems and prospects of the development of rural green tourism in a region]. Rehionalna ekonomika – Regional Economics, 2 (68), 81-88 [in Ukrainian].
Marmul, L.O., & Pinchuk, T.A. (2008). Orhanizatsiia ta rozvytok ahrarnoho turyzmu v rehioni [Organization and development of agrarian tourism in a region]. Kherson: Ailant [in Ukrainian].
Paton, B.Y. (Ed.). (2016). Natsionalna paradyhma staloho rozvytku Ukryiny [National paradigm of the Sustainable Development of Ukraine]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku NAN Ukrainy” [in Ukrainian].
Osadcha, T.S. (2009). Silskyi zelenyi turyzm v Ukraini: okremi aspekty orhanizatsii, obliku i kontroliu [Rural green tourism in Ukraine: some aspects of the organization, accounting and control]. Kherson: Oldi–plius [in Ukrainian].
Khvesyk, M.A., Bystriakov, I.K., Levkovska, L.V., Pylypiv, V.V. (2012). Stalyi rozvytok: svitohliadna ideolohiia maibutnoho [Sustainable development: worldview ideology of the future]. Kyiv: DU “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku NAN Ukrainy” [in Ukrainian].
Stupen, M.H., & Andrushenko, V.Y. (2016). Terytorialna pryvablyvist pryrodno-rekreatsiinykh resursiv Zhytomyrshchyny [Territorial attractiveness of the natural-recreational resources of Zhytomyr region]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific herald of Kherson State University, Vyp. 17 (4), 94-97 [in Ukrainian].
